The Problem With Knowing Where You’re Going

The Multiverse Employee Handbook defines “MapQuest” as “humanity’s first attempt to outsource navigation to computers, resulting in a brief transitional period where people printed directions from the internet, stapled them together with unearned confidence, and then got lost around step eleven whilst simultaneously operating motor vehicles.”

Between 1996 and 2008, civilization experienced a peculiar technological bridge—a moment when we’d figured out that computers could calculate optimal routes but hadn’t yet figured out how to keep those computers with us whilst driving. The solution seemed obvious: print the directions. Take the paper with you. Follow the numbered steps.

It was revolutionary. It was absurd. It worked just well enough to prove the concept whilst failing spectacularly at execution.

And everyone who drove anywhere during those years has a story about missing the turn on page three because they were reading page four, pulling into a petrol station to reorganize stapled pages, or discovering that “47 minutes estimated time” was optimistic propaganda that bore no relation to traffic, construction, or the human capacity to execute complex navigation whilst traveling at speed.

Welcome to the MapQuest era—when the future was six pages long, colour-printed, and inevitably shuffled.

The Revolutionary Concept (That Seems Absurd Now)

Before MapQuest, navigation required one of three approaches:

  1. Paper maps: Large, awkward to fold, impossible to refold correctly, required pulling over to consult
  2. Asking for directions: Dependent on strangers’ questionable spatial memory and tendency to use landmarks that no longer existed
  3. Dead reckoning: “I think it’s this way” delivered with confidence inversely proportional to accuracy

MapQuest launched in 1996 with a premise that seemed genuinely innovative: type two addresses into a website, click “Get Directions,” wait 45 seconds for the page to load (on a good day), and receive computer-calculated turn-by-turn instructions you could print.

The directions were specific. Aggressively specific.


1. Head east on Maple Street toward Oak Avenue (0.3 miles)
1. Turn right onto Oak Avenue (1.7 miles)
1. Turn left onto Highway 47 (8.2 miles)
1. Turn right onto Riverside Drive (3.4 miles)

Each turn numbered. Each distance measured. Each instruction delivered with the confidence of a system that had definitely driven this route multiple times and knew exactly what it was talking about.

The computer knew the way. The computer had calculated the optimal route. The computer estimated your arrival time with precision.

The only problem: the computer stayed home whilst you drove.

The Execution Problem

The typical MapQuest experience followed a predictable pattern:

Phase 1: Optimism

You’d print the directions at work (colour printer, because you were living in the future). Six pages. Carefully stapled. Oriented properly so you could glance down between watching the road. You’d place them on the passenger seat with the confidence of someone who had tamed technology itself.

Phase 2: Reality

By page three, something had gone wrong. You were supposed to be on Highway 47, but the signs said Highway 42. Or possibly you’d missed the turn onto Highway 47 whilst reading the instructions for what to do after Highway 47.

The pages had somehow shuffled. Or you’d skipped direction seven. Or the computer had simply lied about distances.

Phase 3: The Petrol Station Reorganization

You’d pull into a petrol station, spread the pages across the bonnet, and attempt to determine which numbered step corresponded to your current location. Direction fourteen said “Turn right onto Riverside Drive,” but you couldn’t remember if you’d completed direction fourteen or were still looking for direction eleven.

Other drivers would recognize the situation immediately. The colour printing gave it away. And the look of betrayal.

Phase 4: Manual Override

Someone would take pity and write simplified directions on the back of your printout: “Right out of station. Three miles. Large sign on left.”

Two sentences. Zero ambiguity. Directions that actually worked because they were designed for humans operating vehicles rather than stationary observers with unlimited time to read detailed instructions.

The Cultural Impact

At its peak in 2001, MapQuest served 82 million directions per day. Eighty-two million daily opportunities for humans to discover that complex written instructions and vehicle operation don’t combine well.

Libraries installed computers specifically for people to print MapQuest directions. This became a significant public service. Librarians became experts at identifying the distinctive look of someone who’d printed directions, followed them faithfully, and ended up somewhere unexpected.

The stapled printouts became ubiquitous. Every car had them. Tucked into door pockets. Wedged behind sun visors. Scattered across passenger seats. Physical artifacts of humanity’s first attempt to let computers handle navigation.

They represented a bridge—between static computer knowledge and mobile human need. Between accurate route calculation and practical execution. Between “knowing the way” and “finding the way.”

It was an imperfect bridge. But it proved the concept well enough that when smartphones arrived with GPS, the transition was immediate.

The Technology That Made It Obsolete

The iPhone 3G launched in June 2008 with GPS included as standard. Turn-by-turn navigation. Live positioning. Automatic recalculation when you missed turns. The computer was finally in the car.

Google Maps had launched in 2005, but it became truly revolutionary when combined with phone GPS. You could see where you were on the map. The route updated as you drove. You missed direction seven? No problem—the system recalculated instantly.

The MapQuest era ended almost immediately.

Standalone car GPS devices—Garmin, TomTom, Magellan—went from £500 premium products to obsolete in under a decade. Why buy dedicated hardware when your phone did the same thing better?

And printed directions? They became immediately and obviously absurd. The idea of printing six pages of instructions before leaving home seemed charmingly primitive.

People who’d spent years stapling MapQuest printouts suddenly couldn’t imagine navigating without live GPS. The bridge had served its purpose and was no longer needed.

The Artifact in the Box

If you drove anywhere between 1996 and 2008, you probably still have MapQuest directions somewhere. Tucked in a box of memorabilia. Six pages. Carefully stapled. Colour-printed on paper that’s slowly fading.

Maybe it’s directions to a wedding where you arrived late. Or a job interview where you got lost around step eleven. Or a first date where you called from a payphone asking for help because the computer’s 47-minute estimate was, as usual, optimistic fiction.

These printouts are archaeological artifacts now. Physical evidence of the brief transitional period when we’d figured out that computers could navigate but hadn’t yet figured out how to keep them with us.

They proved something important: people wanted this. The execution was flawed—humans can’t read detailed instructions whilst operating vehicles—but the concept was sound. Computer-calculated routes. Automated navigation. Freedom from paper maps and asking strangers for directions.

We just needed one small improvement: put the computer in the car.

When that happened, the revolution was immediate. Nobody needed convincing. We’d been waiting for exactly this, printing directions and getting lost, proving through our failures that the concept worked and the implementation just needed refinement.

The MapQuest era was absurd. It was revolutionary. It was the bridge we needed even though the bridge itself was slightly on fire and missing several key structural supports.

And now it’s history—preserved in boxes of memorabilia and the collective memory of everyone who ever printed directions, missed step eleven, and learned that sometimes progress requires admitting that your brilliant solution is fundamentally flawed but pointing in the right direction.

Further Reading From the Department of Consumer Navigation

For those wishing to explore humanity’s ongoing struggle with navigation and technological transition, visit the actual MapQuest (which still exists, somehow).

And if you find yourself nostalgic for the MapQuest era, remember: you can still print directions. MapQuest still offers this service. You probably won’t. But knowing you could is oddly comforting.

MapQuest taught us that computer navigation was useful. Smartphones taught us it could actually work. And somewhere in a box of memorabilia, those six stapled pages prove that sometimes the bridge between vision and reality is exactly as ridiculous as it needs to be.

Want to hear more? 🎧 Listen to the full episode — GPS: How the Military Built Your Fitness Tracker